About the creator of this site

Laurie Pawlik-Kienlen is a full-time freelance writer on Bowen Island, BC, Canada.

19 Editorial Tips From a Senior Editor

These writing and editorial tips are from a senior editor I write for regularly – and they include some of the most frequent errors she sees in article submissions. Pay attention, fellow scribes, because even when you think you’ve got writing down to a fine art, there’s always more to learn!

“It is perfectly okay to write garbage – as long as you edit brilliantly.” – C. J. Cherryh

Don’t let writer’s block or fear paralyze you. Instead, jot it all down…and edit brilliantly with these editorial tips from an experienced senior editor. For more info on editing and writing, click on Everyday Editing by Jeff Anderson.

Editorial Tips: Quote Your Sources Properly

1. Always include your source list when submitting your article. Include references and links to any studies, research, findings, and people that you reference in your article.

2. Avoid using sources that don’t seem 100% reliable/trustworthy (such as authors of some self-help books). Avoid referring books that are old or out of print (unless it’s a classic), and avoid using too many sources in one article.

3. Don’t refer to a source as a book’s author, when he or she is actually a co-author. Be careful when identifying a book’s title. Make sure you get the title 100% correct.

4. Include and list a source’s academic credentials after his or her name (use Andrew Weil, M.D., at first reference, not Dr. Weil). Add Ph.D. to the source’s name if warranted; it may be taken for granted to you if a scientist is being quoted, but this adds an element of trustworthiness for the reader. Refer to dietician sources as “R.D.,” not “nutritionist” (no academic degree or certification is required to call oneself a nutritionist). Seek out registered dieticians over “nutritionists” as sources.

5. Don’t unnecessarily cap the professional title of a source: “Chief Scientist” instead of “chief scientist”

Editorial Tips: Write Accurately

6. Avoid making overly speculative comments and overpromising results, especially in articles about things like dieting. “You’ll lose 5 pounds in 2 weeks with this plan” is a statement that is dangerous and could result in a lawsuit. Avoid calling a weight-loss study a breakthrough, miracle, etc.

7. Include relevant information that would interest readers, such as where a certain product or procedure is available, when it’ll be available to the public if not yet on the market, etc.

8. Use reliable sources, especially for health information, such as nutrition or diets. Make sure your sources are government-endorsed (National Institute of Health) or widely recognized (Tufts University). There are far too many homemade/sketchy nutrition Web sites.

9. Avoid reliance on a very small study and attributing its results as conclusive/authoritative.

10. Don’t give medical advice that’s unsubstantiated or not evidence-based.

11. Make sure your articles present both sides of a controversial issue. 

Editorial Tips: Pay Attention to Grammar and Punctuation

12. Avoid the overuse of parenthetical phrases for descriptions or details. Brackets are “speed bumps” to readers, and may cause them to stop reading.

13. Punctuate appositive phrases properly.

  • Bad: Common-sense measures like washing your hands or getting a flu shot, can go a long way toward preventing or greatly decreasing your risk for getting one or more of these viral illnesses.
  • Good: Common-sense measures, such as washing your hands or getting a flu shot, can go a long way toward preventing or greatly decreasing your risk for getting one or more of these viral illnesses.

14. Avoid using the plural instead of singular when referring to body parts.

  • Bad: Everyone needs to be concerned about the health of their brains.
  • Good: Everyone needs to be concerned about the health of their brain. (Each person has only one brain!)

15. Watch for sloppy construction.

  • Bad: The FDA urged the public to only eat peanut butter until further notice.
  • Good: The FDA urged the public to eat peanut butter only from jars until further notice. (Otherwise, it sounds like the public should eat peanut butter to the exclusion of every single other food in the world!)
  • Bad: fatty foods you should eat every day.
  • Good: 6 healthy-fat foods  (Nobody should eat 6 fatty foods every day!)

Miscellaneous Editorial Tips

16. Avoid referring to readers in unflattering or unpleasant ways (eg, “chubby” or “dim-witted”).  

17. For expert Q&A articles, focus on the reader’s question. Don’t supplement the piece with related topics until you have answered the reader’s question.

18. Include your proposed title and subtitle (dek) with your article submission or query pitch. Deks could be sentence case (not capitalized).

19. Do not submit your text in any color other than black.

~ Resources for Writers & Bloggers ~

Want to make your blog "sticky", so visitors stay longer? Try this beta "Click and Stick" program -- it's free!

But before you can entice visitors to stick to your blog, you need to learn a bit of search engine optimization. Scribe SEO offers information for web writers, bloggers, and affiliate marketers.

And, to find more freelance writing and editing jobs, consider joining GoFreelance.



  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Share/Bookmark

RSS Feed for This Post8 Comment(s)

  1. Ann Pietrangelo | Mar 15, 2009 | Reply

    Laurie,

    I came to your blog by way of Twitter and I just subscribed to your feed. So many writing blogs leave me unimpressed, but yours is on my list of blogs to visit on my daily rounds.

    Thanks!

  2. Maija Haavisto | Mar 16, 2009 | Reply

    As a medical writer I firmly believe that everyone writing about medical and health topics should primarily get their information from PubMed (and sometimes experts). Way too many people call themselves “health writers” and they pretty much pull all their information fron WebMD and Wikipedia. If you can’t use PubMed, you have no place in writing about anything that has to do with medicine.

  3. Laurie PK | Mar 16, 2009 | Reply

    Thanks for your thoughts, Maija! I’m guilty of relying on experts more than PubMed — your comment is a great reminder to get back into the research findings….and even verify an expert’s words with current studies.

  4. Laurie PK | Mar 16, 2009 | Reply

    And Ann — thanks for your comment! I’m glad you found Quips and Tips helpful, and would love to see you around the site :-)

  5. Tumblemoose | Mar 17, 2009 | Reply

    Laurie,

    Rut-ro. As I perused this list, I’m afraid I may be guilty of some. Afraid I’ll have to take the 5th on which ones though ;-)

    I’ve got this bookmarked for future reference (as I do so many of your posts)

    George

  6. Norm | Mar 26, 2009 | Reply

    Laurie,

    Good stuff.

    About the sentence, “Everyone needs to be concerned about the health of their brain.” It seems that you are in the “it’s okay to use ‘their’ in place of ‘his’” camp. I like it, but some grammar mavens may frown on its use. I continue to substitute one’s though it does sound slightly pretentious.

    Any good work-arounds for the his/her conundrum?

  7. Laurie PK | Mar 26, 2009 | Reply

    Actually, these editorial tips came directly from the editor — with minimal editing on my part! So, I left the “their” in that sentence, even though it stuck in my craw. I did debate tweaking it, but decided to let it rest.

    I don’t like using “one” — I agree that it sounds pretentious. Like Fraser Crane! lol

    My first choice is to use the word “you”, because it’s easier and more personal. But in this case, saying “You need to be concerned about the health of your brain,” is a little too direct. Too targeted, somehow.

    I use plurals whenever I can. If I edited the sentence you pointed out, I would’ve written, “Everyone needs to be concerned about the health of their brains.”

    Thanks for pointing it out, Norm! I think I love grammar :-) not a bad trait for a writer.

  8. Norm | Mar 26, 2009 | Reply

    I pointed this out because “Their” seems to have some acceptance, depending on the style (formal or informal)of the publication. Since this came from an editor that seems to indicate an informal style for “their” ;-) publication. Perhaps in another post you could discuss this?

RSS Feed for This PostWhat do you think, fellow scribes?

CommentLuv Enabled
  • Most Popular Posts